_MediaComparison of SLM and conventionally produced implants using dynamic biomechanical loading 2013.pdfMarker for the pre-clinical development of bone substitute materials 2017.pdfMeier eCM REM DIC 2019.pdfcomparison of implants.pngComparison of SLM and conventionally produced implants using dynamic biomechanical loading, R. Schumacher, P. Lamprecht, S. Zimmermann, M. de Wild, A. Spiegel, RapidTech Erfurt, 2013.Fatigue testing of NiTi Scaffold 2.pngFatigue testing of NiTi Scaffold.pngFatigue testing of NiTi ScaffoldOptical strain fields by Scanning Electron Microscope Digital Image.pngOptical strain fields by Scanning Electron Microscope Digital Image Correlation (SEM-DIC) while tensile testing a) a diamond, b) a single and c) a double strut micro-structure before fracturing. Scale bars indicate 2 mm.Plastic deformation bands perpendicular to the tensile loading direction.pngPlastic deformation bands perpendicular to the tensile loading direction (red arrows in b) are observed in the DIC analysis of an SLM micro specimen mechanically stressed in the SEM even before surface cracks occur. Scale bars indicate 500 µm.Biomechanical testing of meniscus.pngBiomechanical testing of meniscus.Dynamic testing system.bmpRemoval torque testing system.jpgRemoval torque testing system.Tensile testing system with temperature chamber and video laser extensometer.jpgTensile testing system with temperature chamber and video laser extensometer.Tensile testing system 1.jpgAnimated GIF-downsized_large.gif